<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>citizen science Archives - One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/tag/citizen-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/tag/citizen-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 06:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de-DE</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the  diversity of microparticle origins</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2021/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microfiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microparticle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=9004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.P.W. Barrows, S.E. Cathey, C.W. Petersen Environmental Pollution, Volume 237, 2018, Pages 275-284, ISSN 0269-7491, Abstract: Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in all major ocean basins. Microfibers are one of the most common microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers are produced annually; 60% are synthetic and ∼25% are non-synthetic. Non-synthetic and semi-synthetic microfibers are infrequently documented and not typically included in marine environment impact analyses, resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful pollutant. We present the most extensive worldwide microparticle distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n = 1393). Our citizen scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of 11.8 ± 24.0 particles L−1 (mean ± SD), approximately three orders of magnitude higher than global model predictions. Open ocean samples showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the highest concentrations found in the polar oceans (n = 51), confirming previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles were predominantly microfibers (91%) and 0.1–1.5 mm in length (77%), a smaller size than those captured in the majority of surface studies. Using μFT-IR we determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% were classified as synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were taken globally, including from coastal environments and understudied ocean regions. Some of these sites are emerging as areas of concentrated floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant waste mismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of smaller-sized microfibers in oceanographic models, which has been lacking, will help us to better understand the movement and transformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic microparticles in regional seas and ocean basins. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.062.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749117349400)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2021/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins-2/">Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the  diversity of microparticle origins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A.P.W. Barrows, S.E. Cathey, C.W. Petersen</p>
<p>Environmental Pollution, Volume 237, 2018, Pages 275-284, ISSN 0269-7491,</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<p>Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in<br />
all major ocean basins. Microfibers are one of the most common<br />
microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers<br />
are produced annually; 60% are synthetic and ∼25% are non-synthetic.<br />
Non-synthetic and semi-synthetic microfibers are infrequently documented<br />
and not typically included in marine environment impact analyses,<br />
resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful<br />
pollutant. We present the most extensive worldwide microparticle<br />
distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n = 1393). Our citizen<br />
scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of<br />
11.8 ± 24.0 particles L−1 (mean ± SD), approximately three orders of<br />
magnitude higher than global model predictions. Open ocean samples<br />
showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the<br />
highest concentrations found in the polar oceans (n = 51), confirming<br />
previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles were predominantly<br />
microfibers (91%) and 0.1–1.5 mm in length (77%), a smaller size than<br />
those captured in the majority of surface studies. Using μFT-IR we<br />
determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% were classified as<br />
synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were<br />
taken globally, including from coastal environments and understudied<br />
ocean regions. Some of these sites are emerging as areas of concentrated<br />
floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant waste<br />
mismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of<br />
smaller-sized microfibers in oceanographic models, which has been<br />
lacking, will help us to better understand the movement and<br />
transformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic<br />
microparticles in regional seas and ocean basins.</p>
<p><a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7</a></p>
<p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.062.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749117349400)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2021/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins-2/">Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the  diversity of microparticle origins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microfiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microparticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=8057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.P.W. Barrows, S.E. Cathey, C.W. Petersen, Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins, Environmental Pollution,Volume 237, 2018, Pages 275-284, ISSN 0269-7491, Abstract: Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in all major ocean basins. Microfibers are one of the most common microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers are produced annually; 60% are synthetic and ∼25% are non-synthetic. Non-synthetic and semi-synthetic microfibers are infrequently documented and not typically included in marine environment impact analyses, resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful pollutant. We present the most extensive worldwide microparticle distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n = 1393). Our citizen scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of 11.8 ± 24.0 particles L−1 (mean ± SD), approximately three orders of magnitude higher than global model predictions. Open ocean samples showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the highest concentrations found in the polar oceans (n = 51), confirming previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles were predominantly microfibers (91%) and 0.1–1.5 mm in length (77%), a smaller size than those captured in the majority of surface studies. Using μFT-IR we determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% were classified as synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were taken globally, including from coastal environments and understudied ocean regions. Some of these sites are emerging as areas of concentrated floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant waste mismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of smaller-sized microfibers in oceanographic models, which has been lacking, will help us to better understand the movement and transformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic microparticles in regional seas and ocean basins. Keywords: Microfiber; Microplastic; Marine pollution; Microparticle; Citizen science https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.062.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749117349400)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins/">Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A.P.W. Barrows, S.E. Cathey, C.W. Petersen,</p>
<p>Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins,<br />
Environmental Pollution,Volume 237, 2018, Pages 275-284, ISSN 0269-7491,</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<p>Microplastic and microfiber pollution has been documented in all major ocean basins. Microfibers are one of the most common microparticle pollutants along shorelines. Over 9 million tons of fibers are produced annually; 60% are synthetic and ∼25% are non-synthetic.<br />
Non-synthetic and semi-synthetic microfibers are infrequently documented and not typically included in marine environment impact analyses, resulting in underestimation of a potentially pervasive and harmful pollutant.<br />
We present the most extensive worldwide microparticle distribution dataset using 1-liter grab samples (n = 1393). Our citizen scientist driven study shows a global microparticle average of 11.8 ± 24.0 particles L−1 (mean ± SD), approximately three orders of<br />
magnitude higher than global model predictions.<br />
Open ocean samples showed consistently higher densities than coastal samples, with the<br />
highest concentrations found in the polar oceans (n = 51), confirming previous empirical and theoretical studies. Particles were predominantly microfibers (91%) and 0.1–1.5 mm in length (77%), a smaller size than those captured in the majority of surface studies. Using μFT-IR we determined the material types of 113 pieces; 57% were classified as<br />
synthetic, 12% as semi-synthetic, and 31% as non-synthetic. Samples were taken globally, including from coastal environments and understudied ocean regions. Some of these sites are emerging as areas of concentrated floating plastic and anthropogenic debris, influenced by distant waste mismanagement and/or deposition of airborne particles. Incorporation of smaller-sized microfibers in oceanographic models, which has been<br />
lacking, will help us to better understand the movement and transformation of synthetic, semi-synthetic and non-synthetic microparticles in regional seas and ocean basins.<br />
Keywords: Microfiber; Microplastic; Marine pollution; Microparticle;<br />
Citizen science</p>
<p><a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1igOxgrL6DSSvDtXI161CWaJn6ytsp5X7</a><br />
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.062.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749117349400)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-environment-microfiber-contamination-global-patterns-and-the-diversity-of-microparticle-origins/">Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-es/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic marine debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antofagasta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=7961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz, Daniela Honorato-Zimmer, Magdalena Gatta-Rosemary, Paloma Nuñez, Iván A. Hinojosa, Martin Thiel, Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 126, 2018, Pages 516-524, ISSN 0025-326X, Abstract: We examined the hypothesis that in an emerging economy such as Chile the abundances of Anthropogenic Marine Debris (AMD) on beaches are increasing over time. The citizen science program Científicos de la Basura (“Litter Scientists”) conducted three national surveys (2008, 2012 and 2016) to determine AMD composition, abundance, spatial patterns and temporal trends. AMD was found on all beaches along the entire Chilean coast. Highest percentages of AMD in all surveys were plastics and cigarette butts, which can be attributed to local sources (i.e. beach users). The Antofagasta region in northern Chile had the highest abundance of AMD compared with all other zones. Higher abundances of AMD were found at the upper stations from almost all zones. No significant tendency of increasing or decreasing AMD densities was observed during the 8years covered by our study, which suggests that economic development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&#38;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Fd-1NPb3ym3w8FDZBFOUam2nOp3uR2yl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.014.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-es/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches-2/">Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz, Daniela Honorato-Zimmer, Magdalena Gatta-Rosemary, Paloma Nuñez, Iván A. Hinojosa, Martin Thiel,</p>
<p>Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches,<br />
Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 126, 2018, Pages 516-524, ISSN 0025-326X,</p>
<p>Abstract: We examined the hypothesis that in an emerging economy such as<br />
Chile the abundances of Anthropogenic Marine Debris (AMD) on beaches are<br />
increasing over time. The citizen science program Científicos de la<br />
Basura (“Litter Scientists”) conducted three national surveys (2008,<br />
2012 and 2016) to determine AMD composition, abundance, spatial patterns<br />
and temporal trends. AMD was found on all beaches along the entire<br />
Chilean coast. Highest percentages of AMD in all surveys were plastics<br />
and cigarette butts, which can be attributed to local sources (i.e.<br />
beach users). The Antofagasta region in northern Chile had the highest<br />
abundance of AMD compared with all other zones. Higher abundances of AMD<br />
were found at the upper stations from almost all zones. No significant<br />
tendency of increasing or decreasing AMD densities was observed during<br />
the 8years covered by our study, which suggests that economic<br />
development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Fd-1NPb3ym3w8FDZBFOUam2nOp3uR2yl">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Fd-1NPb3ym3w8FDZBFOUam2nOp3uR2yl</a></p>
<p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.014.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-es/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches-2/">Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic marine debis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antofagasta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=7882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz, Daniela Honorato-Zimmer, Magdalena Gatta-Rosemary, Paloma Nuñez, Iván A. Hinojosa, Martin Thiel, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 126, 2018, Pages 516-524, ISSN 0025-326X, Abstract: We examined the hypothesis that in an emerging economy such as Chile the abundances of Anthropogenic Marine Debris (AMD) on beaches are increasing over time. The citizen science program Científicos de la Basura (“Litter Scientists”) conducted three national surveys (2008, 2012 and 2016) to determine AMD composition, abundance, spatial patterns and temporal trends. AMD was found on all beaches along the entire Chilean coast. Highest percentages of AMD in all surveys were plastics and cigarette butts, which can be attributed to local sources (i.e. beach users). The Antofagasta region in northern Chile had the highest abundance of AMD compared with all other zones. Higher abundances of AMD were found at the upper stations from almost all zones. No significant tendency of increasing or decreasing AMD densities was observed during the 8years covered by our study, which suggests that economic development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&#38;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches/">Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valeria Hidalgo-Ruz, Daniela Honorato-Zimmer, Magdalena Gatta-Rosemary, Paloma Nuñez, Iván A. Hinojosa, Martin Thiel,</p>
<p>Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 126, 2018, Pages 516-524, ISSN 0025-326X,</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<p>We examined the hypothesis that in an emerging economy such as Chile the abundances of Anthropogenic Marine Debris (AMD) on beaches are increasing over time. The citizen science program Científicos de la Basura (“Litter Scientists”) conducted three national surveys (2008,<br />
2012 and 2016) to determine AMD composition, abundance, spatial patterns and temporal trends.</p>
<p>AMD was found on all beaches along the entire Chilean coast. Highest percentages of AMD in all surveys were plastics<br />
and cigarette butts, which can be attributed to local sources (i.e. beach users). The Antofagasta region in northern Chile had the highest<br />
abundance of AMD compared with all other zones. Higher abundances of AMD were found at the upper stations from almost all zones. No significant tendency of increasing or decreasing AMD densities was observed during the 8years covered by our study, which suggests that economic development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17309682/pdfft?md5=6de604bdbb8d1651fc7d5b023187ce85&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17309682-main.pdf</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/spatio-temporal-variation-of-anthropogenic-marine-debris-on-chilean-beaches/">Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects  wild life</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=7804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Melanie Bergmann, Birgit Lutz, Mine B. Tekman, Lars Gutow, Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Available online 28 September 2017, ISSN 0025-326X Abstract: Recent data indicate accumulation areas of marine litter in Arctic waters and significant increases over time. Beaches on remote Arctic islands may be sinks for marine litter and reflect pollution levels ofthe surrounding waters particularly well. We provide the first quantitative data from surveys carried out by citizen scientists on six beaches of Svalbard. Litter quantities recorded by cruise touristsvaried from 9–524 g m− 2 and were similar to those from denselypopulated areas. Plastics accounted for &#62; 80% of the overall litter, most of which originated from fisheries. Photographs provided by citizens show deleterious effects of beach litter on Arctic wildlife, which is already under strong pressure from global climate change. Our study highlights the potential of citizen scientists to provide scientifically valuable data on the pollution of sensitive remote ecosystems. The results stress once more that current legislative frameworks are insufficient to tackle the pollution of Arctic ecosystems. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&#38;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf &#160; &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/">Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects  wild life</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie Bergmann, Birgit Lutz, Mine B. Tekman, Lars Gutow,<br />
Citizen scientists reveal:</p>
<p><strong>Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life</strong>,<br />
Marine Pollution Bulletin,</p>
<p>Available online 28 September 2017, ISSN 0025-326X</p>
<p>Abstract:</p>
<p>Recent data indicate accumulation areas of marine litter in Arctic waters and significant increases over time. Beaches on remote Arctic<br />
islands may be sinks for marine litter and reflect pollution levels ofthe surrounding waters particularly well.<br />
We provide the first quantitative data from surveys carried out by citizen scientists on six beaches of Svalbard.</p>
<p>Litter quantities recorded by cruise touristsvaried from 9–524 g m− 2 and were similar to those from denselypopulated areas.<br />
Plastics accounted for &gt; 80% of the overall litter, most of which originated from fisheries. Photographs provided by<br />
citizens show deleterious effects of beach litter on Arctic wildlife, which is already under strong pressure from global climate change. Our<br />
study highlights the potential of citizen scientists to provide scientifically valuable data on the pollution of sensitive remote<br />
ecosystems.<br />
The results stress once more that current legislative frameworks are insufficient to tackle the pollution of Arctic ecosystems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database/2020/marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/">Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects  wild life</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2020/citizen-scientists-reveal-marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birgit Westermayr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL MARINE LITTER DATABASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oneearth-oneocean.com/?p=7799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Melanie Bergmann, Birgit Lutz, Mine B. Tekman, Lars Gutow, Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Available online 28 September 2017, ISSN 0025-326X Abstract: Recent data indicate accumulation areas of marine litter in Arctic waters and significant increases over time. Beaches on remote Arctic islands may be sinks for marine litter and reflect pollution levels of the surrounding waters particularly well. We provide the first quantitative data from surveys carried out by citizen scientists on six beaches of Svalbard. Litter quantities recorded by cruise tourists varied from 9–524 g m− 2 and were similar to those from densely populated areas. Plastics accounted for &#62; 80% of the overall litter, most of which originated from fisheries. Photographs provided by citizens show deleterious effects of beach litter on Arctic wildlife, which is already under strong pressure from global climate change. Our study highlights the potential of citizen scientists to provide scientifically valuable data on the pollution of sensitive remote ecosystems. The results stress once more that current legislative frameworks are insufficient to tackle the pollution of Arctic ecosystems. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&#38;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.055. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2020/citizen-scientists-reveal-marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/">Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie Bergmann, Birgit Lutz, Mine B. Tekman, Lars Gutow, Citizen<br />
scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects<br />
wild life, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Available online 28 September<br />
2017, ISSN 0025-326X</p>
<p>Abstract:<br />
Recent data indicate accumulation areas of marine litter in Arctic<br />
waters and significant increases over time. Beaches on remote Arctic<br />
islands may be sinks for marine litter and reflect pollution levels of<br />
the surrounding waters particularly well. We provide the first<br />
quantitative data from surveys carried out by citizen scientists on six<br />
beaches of Svalbard. Litter quantities recorded by cruise tourists<br />
varied from 9–524 g m− 2 and were similar to those from densely<br />
populated areas. Plastics accounted for &gt; 80% of the overall litter,<br />
most of which originated from fisheries. Photographs provided by<br />
citizens show deleterious effects of beach litter on Arctic wildlife,<br />
which is already under strong pressure from global climate change. Our<br />
study highlights the potential of citizen scientists to provide<br />
scientifically valuable data on the pollution of sensitive remote<br />
ecosystems. The results stress once more that current legislative<br />
frameworks are insufficient to tackle the pollution of Arctic<br />
ecosystems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919/pdfft?md5=97f6ec46875219bde58053e8afcad52a&amp;pid=1-s2.0-S0025326X17307919-main.pdf</a></p>
<p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.055.<br />
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X17307919)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/international-marine-litter-database-en/2020/citizen-scientists-reveal-marine-litter-pollutes-arctic-beaches-and-affects-wild-life/">Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
