<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>crustacean Archives - One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/category/crustacean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/category/crustacean/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de-DE</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Dilemma of Derelict Gear</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/allgemein/2016/the-dilemma-of-derelict-gear/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guenther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allgemein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crustacean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derelict fishing gear]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oneearth-oneocean.com/kb/?p=1287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A. M. Scheld, D. M. Bilkovic &#038; K. J. Havens The Dilemma of Derelict Gear Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 19671 (2016) doi:10.1038/srep19671 Abstract Every year, millions of pots and traps are lost in crustacean fisheries around the world. Derelict fishing gear has been found to produce several harmful environmental and ecological effects, however socioeconomic consequences have been investigated less frequently. We analyze the economic effects of a substantial derelict pot removal program in the largest estuary of the United States, the Chesapeake Bay. By combining spatially resolved data on derelict pot removals with commercial blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) harvests and effort, we show that removing 34,408 derelict pots led to significant gains in gear efficiency and an additional 13,504 MT in harvest valued at US $21.3 million—a 27% increase above that which would have occurred without removals. Model results are extended to a global analysis where it is seen that US $831 million in landings could be recovered annually by removing less than 10% of the derelict pots and traps from major crustacean fisheries. An unfortunate common pool externality, the degradation of marine environments is detrimental not only to marine organisms and biota, but also to those individuals and communities whose livelihoods and culture depend on profitable and sustainable marine resource use. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19671.pdf http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19671#supplementary-information PDF files 1. Supplementary Information http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160121/srep19671/extref/srep19671-s1.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/allgemein/2016/the-dilemma-of-derelict-gear/">The Dilemma of Derelict Gear</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. M. Scheld, D. M. Bilkovic &#038; K. J. Havens<br />
The Dilemma of Derelict Gear<br />
Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 19671 (2016)<br />
doi:10.1038/srep19671</p>
<p>Abstract<br />
Every year, millions of pots and traps are lost in crustacean fisheries<br />
around the world. Derelict fishing gear has been found to produce<br />
several harmful environmental and ecological effects, however<br />
socioeconomic consequences have been investigated less frequently. We<br />
analyze the economic effects of a substantial derelict pot removal<br />
program in the largest estuary of the United States, the Chesapeake Bay.<br />
By combining spatially resolved data on derelict pot removals with<br />
commercial blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) harvests and effort, we show<br />
that removing 34,408 derelict pots led to significant gains in gear<br />
efficiency and an additional 13,504 MT in harvest valued at US $21.3<br />
million—a 27% increase above that which would have occurred without<br />
removals. Model results are extended to a global analysis where it is<br />
seen that US $831 million in landings could be recovered annually by<br />
removing less than 10% of the derelict pots and traps from major<br />
crustacean fisheries. An unfortunate common pool externality, the<br />
degradation of marine environments is detrimental not only to marine<br />
organisms and biota, but also to those individuals and communities whose<br />
livelihoods and culture depend on profitable and sustainable marine<br />
resource use.</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19671.pdf</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19671#supplementary-information</p>
<p>PDF files<br />
1.<br />
Supplementary Information</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160121/srep19671/extref/srep19671-s1.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/allgemein/2016/the-dilemma-of-derelict-gear/">The Dilemma of Derelict Gear</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plastic debris crossing the Pacific can transport more species with the help of barnacles</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/plastic-debris-crossing-the-pacific-can-transport-more-species-with-the-help-of-barnacles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guenther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crustacean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic debris]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oneearth-oneocean.com/kb/?p=1285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>http://news.ufl.edu/articles/2016/02/plastic-debris-crossing-the-pacific-can-transport-more-species-with-the-help-of-barnacles.php Plastic debris crossing the Pacific can transport more species with the help of barnacles FEBRUARY 3, 2016 MICHELLE NEELEY PHOTOGRAPHER: MARINA GARLAND The smooth surfaces of much of the plastic waste rapidly increasing in the ocean appear to provide poor habitat for animals &#8212; that is, until barnacles step in. University of Florida researchers discovered that diverse communities of rafting animals can inhabit even the smoothest pieces of plastic debris if barnacles step in first to create complex habitat, similar to trees in a rainforest or corals in a reef. That means plastics could better transport foreign species across oceans than previously believed, said Mike Gil, who, as a doctoral candidate at UF, led the study published Jan. 27 in Scientific Reports. Now the bad news: While conservationists generally aim to preserve biological diversity, Gil said, the diversity found on plastic debris could be harmful.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/plastic-debris-crossing-the-pacific-can-transport-more-species-with-the-help-of-barnacles/">Plastic debris crossing the Pacific can transport more species with the help of barnacles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://news.ufl.edu/articles/2016/02/plastic-debris-crossing-the-pacific-can-transport-more-species-with-the-help-of-barnacles.php</p>
<p>Plastic debris crossing the Pacific can transport more species with the<br />
help of barnacles</p>
<p>FEBRUARY 3, 2016<br />
MICHELLE NEELEY<br />
PHOTOGRAPHER: MARINA GARLAND</p>
<p>The smooth surfaces of much of the plastic waste rapidly increasing in<br />
the ocean appear to provide poor habitat for animals &#8212; that is, until<br />
barnacles step in.</p>
<p>University of Florida researchers discovered that diverse communities of<br />
rafting animals can inhabit even the smoothest pieces of plastic debris<br />
if barnacles step in first to create complex habitat, similar to trees<br />
in a rainforest or corals in a reef. That means plastics could better<br />
transport foreign species across oceans than previously believed, said<br />
Mike Gil, who, as a doctoral candidate at UF, led the study published<br />
Jan. 27 in Scientific Reports.</p>
<p>Now the bad news: While conservationists generally aim to preserve<br />
biological diversity, Gil said, the diversity found on plastic debris<br />
could be harmful.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/plastic-debris-crossing-the-pacific-can-transport-more-species-with-the-help-of-barnacles/">Plastic debris crossing the Pacific can transport more species with the help of barnacles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oceanic barnacles act as foundation species on plastic debris: implications for marine dispersal</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/oceanic-barnacles-act-as-foundation-species-on-plastic-debris-implications-for-marine-dispersal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guenther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crustacean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic debris]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oneearth-oneocean.com/kb/?p=1283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987 Michael A. Gil &#038; Joseph B. Pfaller Oceanic barnacles act as foundation species on plastic debris: implications for marine dispersal Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 19987 (2016) doi:10.1038/srep19987 Abstract Plastic has emerged as an abundant, stable substratum for oceanic dispersal of organisms via rafting. However, the ecological mechanisms underlying community diversity on plastic debris remain poorly understood. On a cruise from California to Hawai’i, we surveyed plastic debris, some likely originating from the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami, to examine the relationship between rafting community diversity and both habitat area and stalked barnacle (Lepas spp.) abundance. For sessile taxa richness, we observed an interaction in which the positive effect of debris area weakened the negative effect of barnacle cover. In contrast, for mobile taxa richness, including cohabiting species from opposite sides of the Pacific Ocean, barnacle abundance had a positive effect that was strongest at smaller debris sizes. These findings suggest that barnacles, through interactions with habitat area, have trait-dependent effects on other species, serving as both foundation species and competitors, mediating the diversity and dispersal potential of marine organisms on plastic debris. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987.pdf http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987#supplementary-information PDF files 1. Supplementary Information http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160127/srep19987/extref/srep19987-s1.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/oceanic-barnacles-act-as-foundation-species-on-plastic-debris-implications-for-marine-dispersal/">Oceanic barnacles act as foundation species on plastic debris: implications for marine dispersal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987</p>
<p>Michael A. Gil &#038; Joseph B. Pfaller<br />
Oceanic barnacles act as foundation species on plastic debris:<br />
implications for marine dispersal<br />
Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 19987 (2016)<br />
doi:10.1038/srep19987</p>
<p>Abstract<br />
Plastic has emerged as an abundant, stable substratum for oceanic<br />
dispersal of organisms via rafting. However, the ecological mechanisms<br />
underlying community diversity on plastic debris remain poorly<br />
understood. On a cruise from California to Hawai’i, we surveyed plastic<br />
debris, some likely originating from the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami, to examine<br />
the relationship between rafting community diversity and both habitat<br />
area and stalked barnacle (Lepas spp.) abundance. For sessile taxa<br />
richness, we observed an interaction in which the positive effect of<br />
debris area weakened the negative effect of barnacle cover. In contrast,<br />
for mobile taxa richness, including cohabiting species from opposite<br />
sides of the Pacific Ocean, barnacle abundance had a positive effect<br />
that was strongest at smaller debris sizes. These findings suggest that<br />
barnacles, through interactions with habitat area, have trait-dependent<br />
effects on other species, serving as both foundation species and<br />
competitors, mediating the diversity and dispersal potential of marine<br />
organisms on plastic debris.</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987.pdf</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19987#supplementary-information</p>
<p>PDF files<br />
1.<br />
Supplementary Information</p>
<p>http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160127/srep19987/extref/srep19987-s1.pdf</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/north-pacific/2016/oceanic-barnacles-act-as-foundation-species-on-plastic-debris-implications-for-marine-dispersal/">Oceanic barnacles act as foundation species on plastic debris: implications for marine dispersal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas</title>
		<link>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/research/2014/uptake-and-retention-of-microplastics-by-the-shore-crab-carcinus-maenas/</link>
					<comments>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/research/2014/uptake-and-retention-of-microplastics-by-the-shore-crab-carcinus-maenas/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guenther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crustacean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polystyrene (PS)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oneearth-oneocean.com/kb/?p=887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501090e Andrew J. R. Watts, Ceri Lewis, Rhys M. Goodhead, Stephen J. Beckett, Julian Moger, Charles R. Tyler, and Tamara S. Galloway Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48 (15), pp 8823?8830 DOI: 10.1021/es501090e Abstract Microplastics, plastics particles &#60;5 mm in length, are a widespread pollutant of the marine environment. Oral ingestion of microplastics has been reported for a wide range of marine biota, but uptake into the body by other routes has received less attention. Here, we test the hypothesis that the shore crab (Carcinus maenas) can take up microplastics through inspiration across the gills as well as ingestion of pre-exposed food (common mussel Mytilus edulis). We used fluorescently labeled polystyrene microspheres (8?10 ?m) to show that ingested microspheres were retained within the body tissues of the crabs for up to 14 days following ingestion and up to 21 days following inspiration across the gill, with uptake significantly higher into the posterior versus anterior gills. Multiphoton imaging suggested that most microspheres were retained in the foregut after dietary exposure due to adherence to the hairlike setae and were found on the external surface of gills following aqueous exposure. Results were used to construct a simple conceptual model of particle flow for the gills and the gut. These results identify ventilation as a route of uptake of microplastics into a common marine nonfilter feeding species.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/research/2014/uptake-and-retention-of-microplastics-by-the-shore-crab-carcinus-maenas/">Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501090e" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es501090e</a>

Andrew J. R. Watts, Ceri Lewis, Rhys M. Goodhead, Stephen J. Beckett,
Julian Moger, Charles R. Tyler, and Tamara S. Galloway
Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48 (15), pp 8823?8830
DOI: 10.1021/es501090e

Abstract
Microplastics, plastics particles &lt;5 mm in length, are a widespread
pollutant of the marine environment. Oral ingestion of microplastics has
been reported for a wide range of marine biota, but uptake into the body
by other routes has received less attention. Here, we test the
hypothesis that the shore crab (Carcinus maenas) can take up
microplastics through inspiration across the gills as well as ingestion
of pre-exposed food (common mussel Mytilus edulis). We used
fluorescently labeled polystyrene microspheres (8?10 ?m) to show that
ingested microspheres were retained within the body tissues of the crabs
for up to 14 days following ingestion and up to 21 days following
inspiration across the gill, with uptake significantly higher into the
posterior versus anterior gills. Multiphoton imaging suggested that most
microspheres were retained in the foregut after dietary exposure due to
adherence to the hairlike setae and were found on the external surface
of gills following aqueous exposure. Results were used to construct a
simple conceptual model of particle flow for the gills and the gut.
These results identify ventilation as a route of uptake of microplastics
into a common marine nonfilter feeding species.</pre>
<p>The post <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com/research/2014/uptake-and-retention-of-microplastics-by-the-shore-crab-carcinus-maenas/">Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas</a> appeared first on <a href="https://oneearth-oneocean.com">One Earth - One Ocean e. V.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://oneearth-oneocean.com/research/2014/uptake-and-retention-of-microplastics-by-the-shore-crab-carcinus-maenas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
